Oh, Hollywood!

 

by AWB

 
 

Movie producer Robert Evans
image: NICOLE FILOSA

 

I guess it’s the Ben-Franklinishness of Robert Evans’s story that appeals to my cynical glee.

If you’re not familiar with Evans, here’s a rundown. As a 27-year-old New York businessman, an executive selling ladies’ pants, Evans takes a business trip to Beverly Hills, where he takes a swim on an off-day in the hotel pool. A woman catches his eye and begins asking him if he’s an actor, because she’d really like him to play Irving Thalberg in “Man of a Thousand Faces.” (Except, well, he seems to have been in a movie five years before this, so it’s not quite the random career change he describes.) He does, however, get the part, and appears in several newspaper fluff pieces about businessman-to-movie-star crap, as well as a couple more roles, including Pedro Romero the matador in “The Sun Also Rises.” He is a terrible actor, overexposed in the media, and everyone from Hemingway to Errol Flynn wants him fired. The person who makes the titular decision to keep him in is legendary producer Darryl Zanuck.

Realizing his days as an actor are numbered, Evans eventually worms his way into the offices at Paramount, becoming Senior VP. He does this – and this is where my kinky interests come in – because of a newspaper fluff piece describing him as the sort of incredible, flexible-minded, hard-working guy Hollywood can’t afford to lose. After saving Paramount by making a few completely shot-in-the-dark decisions, greenlighting “Rosemary’s Baby,” “Love Story, “ “The Odd Couple,” “The Godfather,” and on and on, he decides to get out and start producing films himself, eventually making Chinatown, “Marathon Man,” “Black Sunday,” “Urban Cowboy,” and so on.

In “The Kid Stays in the Picture,” a documentary based on his autobiography, all this is narrated by the man himself, who repeats that “Luck is when opportunity meets preparation,” and that he had an eye for interesting, fabulous material. This is, of course, undercut by the fact that he admits he hadn’t a clue what the hell “Chinatown” was about, and seems to have depended extremely heavily on the opinions of other readers. A telling clip of Dustin Hoffman’s speech at the Producer’s Guild Awards in honor of Evans (special feature only) shows Hoffman repeating a few days of dialogue with Evans (in a dead-on impersonation) about a particular script. Evans insists for hours it’s the most fabulous thing he’s ever read, that Hoffman must read it, absolutely, that night, without fail. The next day, Hoffman returns to the set and tells him it’s crap. Evans nods, says, “Yeah, just as I thought. It’ll never work.”

What you start to realize is that reality, for Evans, is whatever people with the power to create consensus say it is. The directors of the documentary, Brett Morgan and Nanette Burstein, repeatedly stress in the commentary that Evans desperately tried to convince them to make it into a tragic love story about his marriage to Ali McGraw (who left him for Steve McQueen) and end it with him producing “Chinatown,” at the height of his career, before the drug bust, the entanglement with a murder case, and the flop of “The Cotton Club.” But then the instant Morgan and Burstein say, “No, we’d like to do this and that. It’s more brave and original this way,” he’s happy to go along with it.

His success is not an obsession with being represented in a sunny light; his success comes from making nice with the people who decide what light to show you in. He constantly reiterates that he was a bad actor. Why? I’m guessing it’s because he got terrible reviews. There is no self-against-the-world in Evans, just self-moving-through-the-world. You try to massage the world’s image of you, but once it becomes critical, all you can do is absorb that image and move on.

All of this is to say I find public figures who are totally aware of and respond to their public image as if it’s more real than their own self-image terribly fascinating. Is it possible that Robert Evans doesn’t even have a self-image? That he is completely subsumed within the persona depicted by the media? Does he even have opinions of films and scripts completely apart from the opinions given to him by others? His enthusiasm is certainly infectious. Is that all one needs, along with a pretty face?[B]

AWB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

TANGENTS:
 


David Lynch’s “Inland Empire”